Representative Darrell Issa (R-CA) has introduced a bill aimed at limiting the reach of injunctions issued by federal judges. The legislation, titled the No Rogue Rulings Act (NORRA), seeks to amend the legal parameters within which judges can issue injunctions. According to Issa, “universal” injunctions have been used to hinder President Donald J. Trump‘s agenda since he assumed the presidency in January.
NORRA proposes changes to Chapter 85 of Title 28 of the United States Code, specifying that district courts should issue injunctive relief only for parties directly involved in a legal case. This move is intended to restrict judges from extending injunctions beyond the immediate parties seeking relief. Issa argues that judges acting beyond these limits contribute to “judicial tyranny” and the “weaponization of courts.”
Since January, more than 50 lawsuits have challenged the Trump administration’s executive actions, including executive orders and proclamations. Issa contends that such legal actions exacerbate a trend of judge-shopping, which undermines the executive branch.
Issa’s proposal has gained traction among Republicans. Consequently, the California Republic believes his bill will likely pass through Congress and reach President Trump.
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt has echoed concerns regarding the recent wave of judicial actions against the administration. Labeling the issue a “constitutional crisis,” she criticized the numerous injunctions against Trump’s policies, attributing these to judicial activists rather than impartial judges. Leavitt has mentioned that within just two weeks, at least 12 injunctions were issued, often lacking sufficient legal grounding. These developments, she argues, represent a strategic lawfare effort by Democrat activists against the executive branch. […]
— Read More: thenationalpulse.com
